Community · Peer reviewed
Project Showcase
Post what you built, get structured feedback on code, documentation and the decisions behind both.
- Cadence
- Continuous
- Format
- Structured review
- Audience
- Builders
- Moderation
- Rotating panel
Overview
Showcase is where finished work goes to be read properly. A submission is not a screenshot — it is a running system, a repository and a decision log, reviewed against the same criteria the brief published.
Reviews are written and public. That is deliberate: the reasoning in a good review is as useful to a reader as it is to the author.
Facilities
Structured review form
Architecture, correctness, operability, documentation and decision quality — each scored with written justification.
Rotating panel
Reviewers rotate quarterly so no single voice sets the house style for the whole platform.
Public decision logs
Every showcased project publishes the trade-offs it accepted, which is what makes the archive teach.
Re-review on revision
Address the feedback and resubmit; the second read focuses only on what changed.
How it works
- 01
Submit
Running system, repository, decision log and a short write-up.
- 02
First read
A reviewer checks it against the brief's published criteria.
- 03
Written review
Specific, technical notes published alongside the project.
- 04
Revise
Resubmit once addressed for a focused second read.
- Transit Delay ExplorerData Science · Panel reviewed · Published
- Static Site CompilerComputer Science · Panel reviewed · Published
- Threat Model ToolkitCybersecurity · In review · Open
- Model Evaluation HarnessAI & ML · Panel reviewed · Published
House rules
- 01Review the work, never the person; point at the line, not the author.
- 02Publish the reasoning behind a recommendation, not just the verdict.
- 03Credit sources and prior work when you build on them.
Questions
Questions, answered
01How do I take part?
Build something, share the reasoning, and review someone else's work with the same care you want on yours.
02Is there a cost?
No. Participation is open; what it asks for is effort and good faith rather than a fee.
03How is feedback given?
Against the review criteria: specific, technical and about the work — never about the person.
04What is not tolerated?
Harassment, plagiarism and low-effort self-promotion. Those end participation.